Clear Perspectives - Volume 1 Issue 1
   Subjective effects of antipsychotics
    by Dr Christian Shriqui

The subjective feelings associated with antipsychotics are difficult to evaluate, and it is not unusual in clinical practice that complaints of this type are either believed to be exaggerated or delusional. However, complaints such as antipsychotic-induced dysphoria cannot be dismissed, as they often affect the patient’s compliance, social functioning and quality of life.

Neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome (NIDS)
The concept of antipsychotic-induced deficit syndrome (NIDS) originated during an International Roundtable Meeting in October 1992, partly as a result of ‘awakenings’ reported with clozapine.  The term NIDS was coined to focus attention on the adverse effects of antipsychotics on affect, cognition, and social function.

There is no generally accepted definition of NIDS, which needs to be clearly differentiated from the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia, and from postpsychotic depression. NIDS comprises four areas53:

Assessment methods need to be developed in order to establish the incidence and prevalence of NIDS, to evaluate its importance in the overall treatment outcome of schizophrenia, and to facilitate the development of better antipsychotic agents.

Antipsychotic-induced dysphoria
Antipsychotic-induced dysphoria is an unpleasant behavioral side-effect of antipsychotic drugs. It has been recognized ever since antipsychotics were first introduced into clinical practice.

Hollister54 performed a naturalistic history study in 80 normal individuals who received a single 50mg dose of chlorpromazine. Twenty-five percent of the patients complained of fatigue, sleepiness and overall unpleasant feelings.

Manifestations of NIDS
When it comes to  the manifestations of NIDS, most clinicians are familiar with the following patient complaints:

“I feel unable to concentrate”
“I feel like a zombie”
“I feel emotionally unresponsive”
“I feel like I’m in a chemical straitjacket”

A dysphoric response is a significant predictor of antipsychotic non-compliance55.  NIDS may also manifest as anxiety and derealization, school and work avoidance, or painful sensory symptoms56. Whether antipsychotic-induced dysphoria can also manifest as a cause of, or contributor to, depression is a controversial issue that remains to be resolved.

Determinants of Antipsychotic-Induced Dysphoria
A number of determinants have been idenitified (Table 8)56.
 
 Determinant
 Antipsychotic dosage and type
 
 
 
 

 Time of onset

 Relationship to antipsychotic plasma levels
 
 

 Other (previous exposure, rate of dosage
 increment, duration of antipsychotic
 exposure)

 EPS: 
  Akinesia, rigidity, and tremor
  Akathisia

 Placebo response or misattribution

 Comment
 Probably dose-related

 More commonly reported with high-potency
 antipsychotics, and in association with
 akinesia or severe EPS

 Generally acute

 No unusual or elevated drug plasma levels
 reported - no obvious pharmacokinetic
 explanation55.

 No definitive findings 
 
 
 

 No conclusive evidence
 Stronger evidence reported57

 No comment
 

Table 8. Possible determinants of NIDS56.

Is antipsychotic dysphoria a healthy response ?
Dysphoria probably results in a poor outcome.  However, while many antipsychotic dysphoric patients become non-compliant, others benefit from dysphoria because it prompts clinicians to prescribe lower, yet still effective, doses of antipsychotics, resulting in less severe EPS58.

EPS and medication compliance
Antipsychotic non-compliance in schizophrenia is a major public health problem.  Approximately 74% of antipsychotic-responsive schizophrenic outpatients become non-compliant with their antipsychotic regimen within two years of discharge58. Yet the problem has attracted little good quality, systematic research. Only recently has the importance of this hitherto unrecognized mental health issue been acknowledged.

Akinesia and akathisia appear to be the most commonly reported side-effects related to non-compliance58,59.  Akathisia has been associated with both non-compliance and antipsychotic non-response60.  Antipsychotic non-compliance has also been associated with increased rates of completed suicide, assault and homicide.  For all of these reasons, EPS should be aggressively managed.

Conclusion
It is hoped that newer atypical antipsychotic agents with low EPS-inducing potential will obviate both the subjective and objective unwanted side-effects of the typical or standard antipsychotics61.  In doing so, new drugs will increase a patient’s ability and motivation to participate in treatment and rehabilitation, and thus improve his or her quality of life.

[back] [contents] [forward]